Rev. Esc. Enferm. USP; 52 (), 2018
Publication year: 2018
RESUMO Objetivo:
Avaliar a qualidade de protocolo clínico para atendimento em planejamento familiar de pessoas vivendo com HIV/aids. Método:
Pesquisa avaliativa realizada com base nos seis domínios do Appraisal of Guideline for Research & Evaluation II e no Coeficiente de Variação de Pearson. Resultados:
O protocolo alcançou entre 88,8% e 100,0% de qualidade nos domínios do Appraisal of Guideline for Research & Evaluation II e 93,3% na avaliação global. Obteve-se coeficiente de variação de Pearson entre zero e 18,6. Uma vez que se adotou percentual mínimo de 70,0% à qualidade atribuída pelos avaliadores, conferiu-se qualidade em todos os domínios do Appraisal of Guideline for Research & Evaluation II. Com o coeficiente em todos os domínios inferior a 25%, infere-se que as pontuações atribuídas pelos avaliadores foram lineares ou homogêneas, significando elevada concordância entre eles. Conclusão:
O protocolo foi avaliado como instrumento de qualidade, recomendado para uso por profissionais de saúde que lidam com o planejamento familiar de pessoas vivendo com HIV/aids.
RESUMEN Objetivo:
Evaluar la calidad de protocolo clínico para atención en planificación familiar de personas viviendo con VIH/SIDA. Método:
Investigación evaluativa llevada a cabo con base en los seis dominios del Appraisal of Guideline for Research & Evaluation II y en el Coeficiente de Variación de Pearson. Resultados:
El protocolo alcanzó entre el 88,8% y el 100,0% de calidad en los dominios del Appraisal of Guideline for Research & Evaluation II y el 93,3% en la evaluación global. Se logró el coeficiente de variación de Pearson entre cero y 18,6. Toda vez que se adoptó porcentual mínimo del 70,0% a la calidad atribuida por los evaluadores, se verificó calidad en todos los dominios del Appraisal of Guideline for Research & Evaluation II. Con el coeficiente inferior al 25% en todos los dominios, se infiere que los puntajes atribuidos por los evaluadores fueron lineales y homogéneos, significando elevada concordancia entre ellos. Conclusión:
El protocolo fue evaluado como instrumento de calidad, recomendado para empleo por profesionales sanitarios que manejan la planificación familiar de personas viviendo con VIH/SIDA.
ABSTRACT Objective:
To evaluate the quality of a clinical protocol for family planning care for people living with HIV/AIDS. Method:
An evaluative study based on the six domains of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II and on Pearson's Coefficient of Variation. Results:
The protocol reached between 88.8% and 100.0% quality in the domains of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II and 93.3% in the overall evaluation. The obtained Pearson's coefficient of variation was between zero and 18.6. Considering that a minimum percentage of 70.0% was adopted for the quality attributed by the evaluators, quality has been achieved for all domains of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II. As a coefficient for all domains was less than 25%, we can infer that the scores attributed by the evaluators were linear or homogeneous, meaning high agreement between them. Conclusion:
The protocol was evaluated as a quality instrument, recommended for use by health professionals who deal with family planning for people living with HIV/AIDS.
